I would say ‘99 with the tails worn off, at least one tail.
Oh no, you have it all wrong, it is a long lost work of art from 1809, the paint on the newer piece has chipped off - been eaten off by spiders and such??--and the original date is showing through and Kate is going to be rich, rich, rich when she sells it at Sotheby for millions and millions. Now isn’t that a much more exciting story?
Linkmeister and Lynn - plausible explanations, both. I was sure I bought the picture shortly after I moved into this house, but maybe I didn’t. Time flies and memory muddies.
On the other hand...Cyn, I love your idea. That’s positive thinking. Here I could be sitting on a fortune and didn’t even realize it. Of course, I’ll never know because I wouldn’t part with the picture for anything. Sotheby, eat your heart out.
J—I suspect I’d better stop talking about spiders or I’ll never get you to walk back into my house.
yes, and hurry up and post something else so I don’t have to LOOK at that thang every time I pop on your blog woman!
I’m glad you like the picture. When I was spending a lot of time between here and L.A. the company had rented a condo for us to use. The art was the kind I call “family art,” meaning no one but a family member would ever put it on a wall anywhere.
In the rental condos I’ve ever stayed in, I’m not sure even a family member would like the art on the walls. If you could even call it art. Where do the condo/hotel decorators get their ‘art’ anyway?
My little picture isn’t really ‘art’ either. It’s more like a sign. Never Enough Thyme, it says. Hits the right note for an herby person.
Next entry: Comedy of errors
Previous entry: Artistic integrity



Why do you do these things to me? That is probably the one that freaked me out yesterday. It’s very lucky you were there or you wouldn’t have been able to take that picture of it today. Yeash.