As of this morning, MY congressman wasn’t lending his name to Rep Conyers letter. I called his DC office and very politely asked if he was aware of it and how he stood on it. The woman was a little frazzled, but said she would pass along my encouragement to Mr. Tierney. She wouldn’t or couldn’t say what he thought of it, but said a lot of people had called already. I have to figure he would support Mr. Conyers letter with a little encouragement. He’s usually one of the good guys. Most of the other Massachusetts reps have put their name to it, too.
The memo does seem to be gradually working its way into the mainstream consciousness. That’s very good!
You know about the AfterDowningStreet organization, right? They’re pushing hard to get this into the public eye.
Yep. Their graphic lives over there in my right column. It’s a very pretty graphic. I hope lots of people go visit and adopt a graphic, too!
The Downing Street Memo, like Watergate, will take a while to get some traction, but it will if those of us in the blogosphere continue to keep this outrageous revelation alive. The facts in the memo reflect the rhetoric we heard from London and Washington in the summer before 9-11—but people have forgotten this. They link Saddam erroneously with 9-11. Too many people have died to bury this truth. It is too important; you’re right, this government works for us and is accountable to us. This is the essential key!
Next entry: whyohwhyohwhy???
Previous entry: Nerves of steel, not.



It’s slooooowly edging its way into the MSM. The memo is reprinted in its entirety in today’s Minneapolis Star-Tribune. (Possibly available only if you’re registered with them, in which case you can use the username and password suggested in this dKos diary.)
The Strib has been one of the best papers in the country in recent years. As guyermo suggests in a comment in the above-linked dKos diary, perhaps it would be valuable to drop a note to other newspapers, saying something like “hey, the Star-Tribune finds this newsworthy enough to print it ... why don’t you?”