I notice that your dichondra citation is on a weed identification page. Goes to show, one person’s weed is another person’s idea of sensible xeriscaping. I really do wish we could get past this grass mania. There are so many other attractive groundcovers that would be a much better alternative. Per square foot, grass does a lousy job of taking carbon dioxide out of the air. And it’s a resource hog. ‘Weeds’, on the other hand, do a far better job of cleaning the air and they don’t need much food or water.
I’m beginning to think the captcha word function is scarily alive and messing with our minds… ;)
It was pretty good stuff. I don’t recall ever mowing it, although that may be just selective memory at work. The back yard, on the other hand, had both a fig and a plum tree, which were the dirtiest trees I’d ever seen until I got here and found coral trees.
Sheesh. I think you’re right about that word: this time it’s “ground.” No, I’m not making this up.
Looks as if dichondra is a prostrate ground cover. Spreads out, not up. My ideal. No mowing!
Well, I’m stuck with grass out front, though I hope to slowly encroach on it with ever widening beds of ground cover and perennials like lavender. Low hedges of lavender are very striking and they will take just any kind of weather that Mother N wants to throw at them.
Captcha is falling down on the job. My word is ‘miles’ which doesn’t appear to be applicable at all. Whew!
Next entry: Don't Build There
Previous entry: What flight?



Our entire front yard in Los Angeles back in 1960-1962 was dichondra. Like the clover, it stayed green and didn’t grow very high.
Ok, the word is “farm.” What’s goin’ on here?