Cider Press Hill

Opinion please

I can’t remember when I’ve ever taken issue with a plumber’s bill. I don’t think it’s ever happened in my life time. But I’m just a little bit peeved over what happened yesterday and I wonder if you guys were in my shoes, just how loudly you’d howl. Or if you would.

So. The plumber arrived at my house at 8:03 yesterday morning to begin the furnace fixing process. He was friendly and nice. He looked at the estimate that the other plumber had left on Monday and said he thought it was about right. And he disappeared into the basement. With lots of pipe banging and other strange noises emanating from the bowels of the house, he worked until 11:45. Then he went out to his truck to draw up the itemized bill. He brought it back in the house at 12:00 on the dot, I wrote a check and he left. He said that if I had issues with it, to call the office. He’s just the middle man. I hadn’t said anything up to that point, but he could see that I wasn’t pleased. But I also know there is no point in arguing with the plumber.

The bill came in at $300 and change over the estimate the other plumber gave me (both work for the same company, of course). The labor charges were not $50 per hour, but $84 per hour. Part of the labor charge involved the plumber’s transit time from home to my house. He left his house at 7:15 am and that’s when my labor charges meter began running. He also stated on the bill that he worked until 12:15. Which he didn’t. He was “employed” from 7:15 am until Noon (if you consider the 15 minutes that involved the bill writing in his truck). In my book (generously) that is 5 hours of charges, even if I think paying him for his transit time is wrong. I’m just old fashioned, I guess. Nevertheless, the labor charges came out to more than 5 1/2 hours of work.

Now, the other plumber told me that the job would take about 4 hours and told me exactly what needed to be replaced. Same stuff as what yesterday’s plumber replaced. The job took him a few minutes short of four hours. But he said the job was harder than anticipated. Lots of pipe cutting and so forth. Yet, it’s part of the job, was within the 4 hours of work, and didn’t require any additional parts or pieces. The other plumber who drew up the estimate said that there would have to be quite a lot of pipe cutting. It was going to be a big job.

So how did the actual bill turn out being $300 over the estimate?

And in light of the overage and the padded labor costs, I’m even more peeved that I got re-charged yesterday for the privilege of having the plumber walk through my front door after having paid the same fee on Monday for a job that the company knew was going to involve more work than the plumber had time for when he walked in the door. They all knew they were going to have to reschedule the job for a full half day. My furnace fixing ended up costing me slightly over $1000 (plus the original consult fee) and it was only supposed to cost me $650.

I’m pretty pissed about that. I’m thinking that I should call the plumbing company’s office and complain a little bit. At least get them to refund the first “walk through the door” charge. And readjust the labor charges to reflect the actual time involved. This is a reputable plumbing company and they do good work. I’ve used them before. No problem. But this time, I’m not happy about the creative billing and the estimate overage, which isn’t exactly an insignificant amount.

Posted on 02/17/05 at 08:26 AM
 




Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Cider Press Hill

Next entry: We look different

Previous entry: Pray for a short memory